Long-gap esophageal atresia: gastric transposition or esophageal lengthening with delayed primary anastomosis? A systematic review.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate different surgical approaches to long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is unclear. METHODS: A systematic literature review was done comparing gastric transposition versus esophageal lengthening with delayed primary anastomosis in infants with LGEA+/-TEF. The primary outcome was time to full oral feeds. Secondary outcomes were time to full enteric feeds, need for further surgery, growth, mortality, and postoperative adverse events. RESULTS: No comparative studies were found. However, the literature was re-interrogated for non-comparative studies. Four hundred thirty-eight articles were identified and screened, and 18 met the inclusion criteria. All were case series. Forty-three infants underwent gastric transposition, and 106 had esophageal lengthening with delayed primary anastomosis. One study on gastric transposition reported time to full oral feeds, and one study in each group reported growth. Time to full enteric feeds was reported in one study in each group. 30% of infants had further surgery following gastric transposition, including hiatus hernia repair (5/43, 12%) and esophageal dilation (7/43, 16%). Following esophageal lengthening, 62/106 (58%) had anti-reflux surgery, 58/106 (55%) esophageal dilatation and 11/106 (10%) esophageal stricture resection. Anastomotic complications occurred in 13/43 (30%), gastrointestinal in 16/43 (37%), respiratory in 17/43 (40%), and nerve injury in 2/43 (5%) of the gastric transposition group. In the esophageal lengthening group, anastomotic complications occurred in 68/106 (64%), gastrointestinal in 62/106 (58%), respiratory in 6/106 (6%), and none sustained nerve injury. Each group had one death due to a cause not directly related to the surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights the morbidity associated with both surgical procedures and the variety in reporting outcomes.

Proactive esophageal cooling during laser cardiac ablation: A computer modeling study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laser ablation is increasingly used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). However, atrioesophageal injury remains a potentially serious complication. While proactive esophageal cooling (PEC) reduces esophageal injury during radiofrequency ablation, the effects of PEC during laser ablation have not previously been determined. We aimed to evaluate the protective effects of PEC during laser ablation of AF by means of a theoretical study based on computer modeling. METHODS: Three-dimensional mathematical models were built for 20 different cases including a fragment of atrial wall (myocardium), epicardial fat (adipose tissue), connective tissue, and esophageal wall. The esophagus was considered with and without PEC. Laser-tissue interaction was modeled using Beer-Lambert's law, Pennes' Bioheat equation was used to compute the resultant heating, and the Arrhenius equation was used to estimate the fraction of tissue damage (FOD), assuming a threshold of 63% to assess induced necrosis. We modeled laser irradiation power of 8.5 W over 20 s. Thermal simulations extended up to 250 s to account for thermal latency. RESULTS: PEC significantly altered the temperature distribution around the cooling device, resulting in lower temperatures (around 22°C less in the esophagus and 9°C in the atrial wall) compared to the case without PEC. This thermal reduction translated into the absence of transmural lesions in the esophagus. The esophagus was thermally damaged only in the cases without PEC and with a distance equal to or shorter than 3.5 mm between the esophagus and endocardium (inner boundary of the atrial wall). Furthermore, PEC demonstrated minimal impact on the lesion created across the atrial wall, either in terms of maximum temperature or FOD. CONCLUSIONS: PEC reduces the potential for esophageal injury without degrading the intended cardiac lesions for a variety of different tissue thicknesses. Thermal latency may influence lesion formation during laser ablation and may play a part in any collateral damage.

Operative Experience of Esophageal Surgery among General Surgery Residents in the United States: An Analysis of ACGME Operative Case Logs.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal surgery is an essential component of general surgery training and encompasses several types of cases that are logged by general surgery residents. There is a scarcity of data on the quality and volume of esophageal surgery experience during surgical residency in the United States. We analyzed trends for 9 different esophageal procedure categories logged by residents in the United States, with the aim to identify areas for improvement in training. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of operative case logs of all general surgery residents graduating from programs accredited by the ACGME over a fourteen-year period from 2009 to 2023. Data on mean esophageal cases reported by graduates, including mean in each procedure subcategory were retrieved. Cases were categorized as either surgeon chief or surgeon junior for each procedure category. Mann-Kendall trend test was used to obtain tau statistics and p-value for trends in mean operative surgical volume for the total number of cases in each operative category over the study period. Trends in surgeon chief and surgeon junior cases were also investigated for each operative category. RESULTS: The mean number of all esophageal procedures performed per resident during their training increased significantly from 10.5 in 2009 to 16 in 2022 (τ = 0.833, p < 0.001). This trend observed among all esophageal procedures during this 14-year study can be largely attributed to the steady increase in the number and proportion of laparoscopic esophageal antireflux procedures performed (τ = 0.950, p < 0.001). Additionally, esophagectomy procedures had a statistically significant, but modest, increase during the study period (τ = 0.505, p = 0.023), from a mean of 1 case during training in 2009 to a peak of 1.3 in 2020. Although the general trend of esophagus procedures increased during the study period, most categories (7 out of 9) either decreased or did not significantly change. Esophagogastrectomy volume decreased significantly by 30%, from 1 per resident during their training in 2009 to 0.7 in 2022 (τ = -0.510, p = 0.018), esophageal diverticulectomy procedures decreased by 50% from 0.2 to 0.1 (τ = -0.609, p = 0.009), and operations for esophageal stenosis decreased by 75% from 0.4 to 0.1 (τ = -0.734, p = 0.001). Mean number of esophageal bypasses (τ = -0.128, p = 0.584), repair of perforated esophageal disease (τ = -0.333, p = 0.156), and other major esophagus procedures (τ = 0.416, p = 0.063) did not significantly change. CONCLUSION: The operative volume of esophageal surgery that general surgery residents in the United States are exposed to has significantly risen over the past 14 years, largely driven by the increase in laparoscopic antireflux procedures. However, given the recent advances and the resultant heterogeneity in both esophageal surgery, the increase in resident operative volume is still inadequate to ensure the training of safe and adept esophageal surgeons, necessitating postresidency specialized training for trainees interested in esophageal surgery.

[Endovascular Repair of Aortic Injury Caused by Esophageal Foreign Body:Report of a Case].

A 51-year-old man visited to our hospital because of chest discomfort and hematemesis. He was diagnosed with Mallory-Weiss syndrome and followed in outpatient clinic. One week later, he visited our hospital again for fever and discomfort. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed a foreign body perforated in the mediastinum in the upper esophagus, and he was urgently hospitalized for surgical removal of esophageal foreign body. Before surgery he vomited the esophageal foreign body with a lot of blood. Hematemesis was stopped spontaneously and contrast-enhanced CT revealed a pseudoaneurysm in the distal aortic arch, so thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed to prevent rupture. Esophageal endoscopy found that the site of esophageal injury healed spontaneously, so the patient was followed conservatively with antibiotics. He was discharged on postoperative day 18 uneventfully. TEVAR was an effective treatment for aortic injury caused by esophageal foreign body in our case.

A Multidisciplinary Minimally Invasive Approach Is Necessary for the Contemporary Management of Esophageal Diverticula.

Background: Esophageal diverticula were traditionally treated with open surgery, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Management has shifted to minimally invasive approaches with several advantages. We examine outcomes in patients with esophageal diverticula treated with minimally invasive techniques by a multidisciplinary surgical team at a single center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for esophageal diverticula at our institution from June 2010 to December 2022. Primary outcomes were 30-day morbidity and mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were symptom resolution, length of stay (LOS), readmission, and need for reintervention. Results: A total of 28 patients were identified. Twelve patients had pharyngeal diverticula, 7 patients had midesophageal diverticula, and 9 patients had epiphrenic diverticula. Thirty-day morbidity and readmission rates were 10.7% (3 patients), 1 pharyngeal (sepsis), 1 midesophageal (refractory nausea), and 1 epiphrenic (poor oral intake). There were no esophageal leaks. Average LOS was 2.3 days, with the pharyngeal group experiencing a significantly shorter LOS (1.3 days versus 3.4 days for midesophageal, P < .01 versus 2.8 days for epiphrenic, P < .05). Symptom resolution after initial operation was 78.6%. Reintervention rate was 17.9%, and symptom resolution after reintervention was 100%. There were no mortalities. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that esophageal diverticula can be repaired safely and efficiently when performed by a multidisciplinary team utilizing advanced minimally invasive endoscopic and robotic surgical techniques. We advocate for the management of this rare condition at a high-volume center with extensive experience in foregut surgery.

Laryngotracheoesophageal Cleft Type IV in a Preterm Neonate. A Case Report and Literature Review.

We present a case of a preterm neonate with a type IV laryngo-tracheo-oesophageal cleft, an uncommon congenital malformation, resulting from the failure of separation of the trachea and the oesophagus during fetal development, often associated with other deformities as well. Data in the literature shows that the long-term morbidity from the entity has declined over the last decades, even though prognosis remains unfavourable for types III and IV. This report emphasizes the complex issues neonatologists are faced with, when treating neonates with this rare disorder in the first days of life, what will raise suspicion of this rare medical entity, and that direct laryngoscopy/bronchoscopy finally depicts the exact extension of the medical condition. At the same time extensive evaluation for coexisting congenital anomalies should be performed. For all the above reasons, these neonates should be treated in specialized tertiary pediatric centers for multidisciplinary prompt management, which may improve, the outcome.

Airway leakage due to malpositioning of esophageal temperature probe during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a case report.

Measuring patients' core body temperature during surgery is essential and commonly performed with an esophageal temperature probe. The probe must be placed in the lower third of the esophagus for accurate measurement. In this case report, we describe our experience of discovering an inadvertently malpositioned esophageal temperature probe in the right inferior lobar bronchus, which led to ventilation-related problems in a patient undergoing prostate surgery.

Predictors of spontaneous passage of ingested foreign bodies in adults: twelve years of experience.

BACKGROUND: Foreign body ingestion in adults is commonly encountered in clinical practice. The therapeutic approach of whether to follow-up or extract is often controversial. AIM: We aimed to explore predictors for spontaneous passage of ingested foreign bodies by focusing on foreign body type, length, and location of impaction. METHODS: We performed a 12-year retrospective single-center study. Logistic regression analysis was done to identify predictors of spontaneous passage. RESULTS: Overall, 365 patients with foreign body ingestion were included. The rate of spontaneous passage was 53.7% in general, while the spontaneous passage rate was 47.9% in food impaction, 44.3% in sharp objects, 88.7% in blunt objects and only 22.2% in long blunt objects (> 6 cm). On regression analysis, esophageal location was associated with a higher impaction rate and lower spontaneous passage vs. stomach and small and large intestine (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07-0.31, OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.37 and OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.003-0.14), respectively. Performing Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis found that the maximal length above which the foreign body will fail to pass spontaneously was 3.5 cm in the stomach and 3 cm in the small intestine, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8509 in stomach and 0.8073 in small intestine. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic removal was needed for all esophageal foreign bodies, and all foreign bodies more than 3.5 cm above the duodenum. Spontaneous passage of ingested foreign body in a selected cohort of patients depends on foreign body type, location, and length.

EsophAguS Deviation During RadiofrequencY Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: The EASY AF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Injury to the esophagus has been reported in a high percentage of patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the incidence of esophageal injury in patients undergoing ablation of AF with and without an esophageal deviating device. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, controlled Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption trial compared the incidence of ablation-related esophageal lesions, as assessed by endoscopy, in patients undergoing AF ablation assigned to a control group (luminal esophageal temperature [LET] monitoring alone) compared with patients randomized to a deviation group (esophagus deviation device + LET). This novel deviating device uses vacuum suction and mechanical deflection to deviate a segment of the esophagus, including the trailing edge. RESULTS: The data safety and monitoring board recommended stopping the study early after randomizing 120 patients due to deviating device efficacy. The primary study endpoint, ablation injury to the esophageal mucosa, was significantly less in the deviation group (5.7%) in comparison to the control group (35.4%; P < 0.0001). Control patients had a significantly higher severity and greater number of ablation lesions per patient. There was no adverse event assigned to the device. By multivariable analysis, the only feature associated with reduced esophageal lesions was randomization to deviating device (OR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.04-0.46; P = 0.001). Among control subjects, there was no difference in esophageal lesions with high power/short duration (31.8%) vs other radiofrequency techniques (37.2%; P = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: The use of an esophageal deviating device resulted in a significant reduction in ablation-related esophageal lesions without any adverse events.

Hybrid primary puncture in stapler-assisted total laryngectomy.

In Video S1, a new surgical technique for hybrid primary tracheoesophageal (TE) puncture in stapler-assisted total laryngectomy is shown. The video describes the surgical steps of the procedure and illustrates some tips and tricks. The procedure incorporates an upper mini-pharyngotomy to enable retrograde placement of the voice prosthesis (VP), eliminating the need for rigid esophagoscopy. This has made it possible to exploit, without additional risks, the potential of the stapler combined with primary TE puncture and VP placement. In our experience, this hybrid procedure in stapler-assisted total laryngectomy is not related to adverse events such as pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF), hypertonicity, and functional complications. Therefore, it can be considered a valid technique that allows for easy insertion of a primary voice prosthesis also in case of mechanical sutures.

Pediatric Patient With Persistent Postoperative Fevers After Esophageal Foreign Body Removal.

A healthy teenager presented to the emergency department with high-grade fever, neck pain, and a foreign body sensation in the throat after eating chicken 3 days prior. What is your diagnosis?

Surgical treatment of esophago-tracheobronchial fistulas after esophagectomy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical treatment of esophago-tracheobronchial fistulas (ETBFs) that occurred after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction in a tertiary referral center for esophageal surgery. All patients who underwent surgical repair for an ETBF after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction were included in a tertiary referral center. The primary outcome was successful recovery after surgical treatment for ETBF, defined as a patent airway at 90 days after the surgical fistula repair. Secondary outcomes were details on the clinical presentation, diagnostics, and postoperative course after fistula repair. Between 2007 and 2022, 14 patients who underwent surgical repair for an ETBF were included. Out of 14 patients, 9 had undergone esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis and 5 esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis after which 13 patients had developed anastomotic leakage. Surgical treatment consisted of thoracotomy to cover the defect with a pericardial patch and intercostal flap in 11 patients, a patch without interposition of healthy tissue in 1 patient, and fistula repair via cervical incision with only a pectoral muscle flap in 2 patients. After surgical treatment, 12 patients recovered (86%). Mortality occurred in two patients (14%) due to multiple organ failure. This study evaluated the techniques and outcomes of surgical repair of ETBFs following esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction in 14 patients. Treatment was successful in 12 patients (86%) and generally consisted of thoracotomy and coverage of the defect with a bovine pericardial patch followed by interposition with an intercostal muscle.

Can We Do Anything Else before Removing a Button Battery from the Esophagus?-Hyaluronic Acid.

OBJECTIVE: This article tests the protective effect of a commercially available mixture of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate, and poloxamer 407 on the damage caused by the exposure of esophageal mucosa to button batteries in an animal model. METHODS: Experimental study. Sixty porcine esophageal samples were distributed in three groups: control (CG), exposure (EG), and exposure-protection (EPG). In EG and EPG, one CR2032 button battery per sample was inserted, both were subdivided into 2-, 4-, 6-, and 24-hour exposure subgroups, with subsequent battery removal. EPG samples were irrigated with the solution 1 hour after battery exposure. Esophageal pH and final voltage of the battery were measured. RESULTS: pH in CG remained stable. No significant differences in pH at 1 hour were found between EG and EPG. In EPG, the pH of the mucosa exposed to the anode was lower than in GE at 2 hours (12.44 vs. 11.89, p = 0.203) and 4 hours (13.78 vs. 11.77, p < 0.0001). In the cathode pH was significantly higher in EG at 2 hours (2.5 vs. 4.11, p < 0.0001), 4 hours (2.33 vs. 4.78, p < 0.0001), and 6 hours (2.17 vs. 2.91, p < 0.0001). Significant voltage reduction at 1 hour was found in EG compared to EPG (0.48 vs. 1.08 V, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Exposure to hyaluronic acid solution buffers the acidification on the side exposed to the cathode and basification on the anode. This effect can be maintained up to 3 to 5 hours, even after stopping its application. Our results suggest that a solution containing hyaluronic acid could be used as an esophageal protector after accidental ingestion of button batteries.

Complications and Functional Outcomes After Esophageal Reconstruction with an Intact Larynx.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal defects can result from primary pathologies such as malignancy or stricture, or secondary ones such as perforation due to trauma or iatrogenic injury. Techniques, management, and outcomes of reconstruction in this setting are poorly understood. Herein, we aim to highlight surgical outcomes in patients undergoing local and free flap reconstruction of esophageal defects in the setting of an intact larynx. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent esophageal reconstruction with an intact larynx between 2009 and 2022 at our institution was performed. RESULTS: Ten patients met inclusion criteria. Esophageal reconstruction was performed for extruded spinal hardware (n = 8), and esophageal stricture (n = 2). Four patients underwent reconstruction with free tissue transfer, and six with local pedicled flaps. There were no cases of flap failure, esophageal fistula, hematoma, or wound dehiscence. One patient had post-operative bleeding requiring return to the operating room. Three patients had a postoperative wound infection, two of whom required washout. There were no unplanned 30-day readmissions. At three months after operation, all patients who were not tube feed-dependent prior to surgery returned to oral intake. Of the four patients who were tube feed-dependent preoperatively, three were tolerating oral intake at nine months postoperatively. Nine patients (90%) had stable flexible laryngoscopy exams pre- and postoperatively with no voice changes. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of esophageal defects in the setting of an intact larynx can be challenging. In this series, surgical intervention with free tissue transfer and local pedicled flaps was effective in returning patients to oral intake with low long-term morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:1227-1233, 2024.